For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and forum.altaycoins.com really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr since pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to expand his range, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are talking about information here, we actually mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for akropolistravel.com example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators' content on the internet to their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its best performing markets on the unclear guarantee of development."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them license their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library containing public information from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, larsaluarna.se to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.